ECM Editorial: Voting restrictions outweigh the merits of photo ID

This country is stronger when virtually every adult is empowered with their constitutional right to vote.

Few restrictions should limit this right, and a change in those limits should only be made when it’s been demonstrated that the rights of the majority are in danger.

There are two principles of a free election on which all should agree.  Those who either are not citizens or who have lost their right to vote should not be voting. Every citizen regardless of economic physical condition, politics, religious belief, race, gender or age must be given an opportunity to vote.

On Nov. 6, Minnesotans will vote on a significant change in voting rights – a constitutional amendment that would require a valid voter identification with a photograph of the individual voting.

If passed, the amendment also says the state must issue photographic identification at no charge.  A voter unable to provide a government-issued photograph identification would be permitted to cast a provisional ballot that can be counted only after lawful identification is provided.

The Editorial Board of ECM Publishers Inc., heard presentations by two experts on both sides of this question.  One representing opposition to the amendment was Mark Ritchie, secretary of state, and a chief proponent, Rep. Mary Kiffmeyer, former secretary of state.

After those presentations and some discussion, the board voted to oppose the voter ID amendment.

Republicans who have proposed the amendment argue that strict voter ID laws are necessary to prevent voter fraud.

The editorial board’s primary reason for opposing the amendment is lack of evidence of voter fraud and voter impersonation in Minnesota elections. According to an exhaustive search and analysis of voter fraud by the Carnegie-Knight’s “News21” program, there have been 10 cases of voter fraud and no cases of voter impersonation in Minnesota since the year 2000.

Proponents of the amendment point to 6,200 people who voted in an election whose addresses could not be traced.  The inability of following up on the addresses  for 6,200 out of two to three million voters is not proof of voter fraud and much less conclusive proof that the constitution should be amended.

County officials are concerned that passage of the voter ID amendment alone would cost local, county and state governments millions of extra dollars. Some experts believe that voter photo ID would make it more difficult for poor people and minorities to vote.

Proponents counter that the amendment would strengthen the integrity of the voting system and guarantee that the one voting is the one in the photograph, eliminating voter impersonation. The News 21 study, however, showed that of 146 million registered voters in the United States in elections since the year 2000, there were 10 cases of voter impersonation.

The editorial board also noted that Minnesota consistently is a leader in voter turnout, in part because it has same-day voter registration that would be eliminated in favor of provisional voting, which some experts believe could reduce the number of voters, drive up the cost of elections and delay the outcome.

The editorial board also stressed that the mechanics of conducting an election should be handled in the Legislature and not by amending the constitution, which was written to protect voter freedom.

In the final analysis, the empowerment of every citizen to cast a ballot outweighs the prevention of perceived but unproven voter fraud.

This is a product of the ECM Editorial Board. Sun Thisweek and the Dakota County Tribune are part of ECM Publishers Inc.

  • TAXPAYER28

    1st point voting is not a right, but rather a Responsibility.
    2nd point to allow an illegitimate vote Illegitimate disenfranchises the legal ones.
    Voter fraud is a reality here in the peoples State of Minnesota, united State of the Americas
    hope I won’t be dragged off to the gulag for speaking up.

    • Michael

      Dear Taxpayer,

      1) Actually, voting is a right for all citizens (unless they are former felons). It isn’t a “responsibility.” It isn’t a “privilege.” It is your right, and my right.
      2) The prevalence of voter fraud in Minnesota (or anywhere) is, statistically speaking, non-existent. Yes, a small number of voter fraud probably does occur… but it likely occurs in such a disparate manner that it provides no advantage or disadvantage to anyone.
      3) It is interesting to me that you use the term “disenfranchisement” in support of a measure that has been demonstrably proven to disenfranchise a sizable percentage of poor and underprivileged voters… and this is actual citizens who want to vote.

      In essence, a vote for the Voter ID amendment is a vote to disinfranchizes tens of thousands (if not hundreds of thousands) of citizens for the fear of a few hundred cases of potential voter fraud per year. You aren’t just throwing the baby out with the bathwater… you’re also disposing of her mom, her dad, her uncle who is “down on his lucK,” and her elderly grandparents.

      • TAXPAYER28

        “Down on your luck”, my foot. It will make it more difficult to vote for all those dementia patients in the nursing home. If passed, these illegitimate votes can be accounted for.

  • Jan Dobson

    Sounds like ECM’s position on voter ID is, in a nutshell, what you don’t know can’t hurt you.

    Good Grief!

    So much for investigative journalism. So much for digging deep to get the real story. So much for being the public watchdog.

up arrow