Lakeville Schools apply to offer all-virtual option this fall

District seeking state approval for plan

The Lakeville Area School District is seeking state approval to break through its physical boundaries next year.

After nearly four years of preparation, the district has applied to debut “Link12” a comprehensive, full-time K-12 online learning program this fall.

The request for the district to become an online learning provider was submitted to the state this week, and a response must be received within 90 days.

Lakeville Schools Superintendent Lisa Snyder said if the state approves the plan, Lakeville will be the first district in the metro to offer a full-time virtual education option.

“It’s part of our vision of personalized learning for all students,” Snyder said. “One size doesn’t fit all anymore.”

Snyder said the program, if approved, would allow the potential for a student to graduate from Lakeville schools without ever having set foot in one of its schools.

Students will also be accepted from other districts.

The virtual program would allow a flexible learning option for students who are involved in high levels of training to pursue goals like competing in the Olympics or seeking a career as a professional dancer.

Emily McDonald, PK-12 Teaching and Learning coordinator, said while the classes would allow flexibility, they would still be of a high-quality, rigorous nature and each class size would be limited to 40 students.

Courses proposed to be offered are social studies, language arts, math and science and would utilize District 194 curriculum.

Electives include physical education, Mandarin Chinese, Spanish, French, health, art for K-5, music and career investigations for senior high students.

Teachers would conduct classes using a “learning management system,” that could include PowerPoint presentations, links to videos and lectures and discussion threads to conduct class.

Special needs students would be provided a case manager who would connect with them online and provide support, and services like speech therapy could be provided through online programming, in-home services or in a clinic or office.

Additional per-pupil funding generated would help pay teachers’ stipends and provide students with a Google Chromebook.
Online students would also receive a Gmail account, Google Docs and access to a learning management system.

McDonald said the program could help return some of the per-pupil funding the district loses when in-district students seek other educational options.

According to Snyder, the district receives about $9,000 per pupil in state and local levy funding, making the district’s additional revenue potential $18.1 million just for 2,016 in-district students who either homeschool, attend private schools or open enroll elsewhere.

“We want to increase enrollment in our district and we want to retain the students we have,” McDonald said. “Students are seeking a flexible option. We want to be able to provide that for them here in Lakeville.”

Online-only students would have to pass all state-sponsored tests, and those results would serve as a “huge red flag” if a virtual student were cheating the system and not actually doing the work, Snyder said.

They would also be eligible to enroll in district sports and activities.

McDonald said since the state approval would likely come sometime in July, the district will “be ready to hit the ground running” as soon as it comes.

“This is in line with where we want to be long term,” McDonald said. “And that is to serve our students in our community and beyond at a very high level as well as maybe generate some additional revenue for this district.”

 

  • Lakeville resident

    The number of in-district students who pursue other options is wrong!!! That is the total number of students STATE wide…not DISTRICT wide. Get it right or don’t use it as it is very misleading!! It should also be noted that there are 24 other online programs already up and running in Minnesota. How much money is the district going to pay to develop and promote a program that may or may not generate more revenue?

    • http://sunthisweek.com Laura Adelmann

      According to Lakeville-Area School District Superintendent Lisa Snyder, the district has the following numbers of students who are within the Lakeville School District but are not attending Lakeville schools:
      600 homeschoolers
      750 open enrolling out
      666 private – (itemized below)
      * 2,016 total

      Private school students:
      Grade Tally
      K 71
      1 59
      2 59
      3 68
      4 36
      5 66
      6 49
      7 64
      8 42
      9 42
      10 41
      11 34
      12 35

      — Laura Adelmann

      • Lakeville resident

        Have you personally seen the data to support those numbers?

  • Lakeville resident

    In her data, she states that 18% or 135 students “open enroll” in District 917. That is a false statement as those students are placed in those programs by our school district. This makes me curious about the accuracy of the rest of her data.

    • Jan Dobson

      Are you accusing Superintendent Snyder of providing false data?

      • Lakeville resident

        I am saying that the open enrollment number if incorrect. It should be 625….that is a fact.

  • Lakeville resident

    I am saying that based on the fact that I told her that number is incorrect and she is still using it makes me want to see the evidence of the rest of the data…just sayin!

  • Lakeville resident

    Also, the All Saints students should be in their own category because unless we start teaching catholic doctrine in the public schools, no matter what programs we spend money on to put it, they aren’t coming to the public schools.

  • Rosie from Rosemount

    Lakeville resident,

    Do you understand that other non-Catholic parochial schools are also in the numbers? As are home-schooled kids whose parents do not want their children exposed to public school dynamics.

    There are many reasons to send your child to a parochial school. My spouse went to a Catholic boys high school and many of his classmates were Jewish. They did not attend Catholic school instead of a public school because the Catholics taught Hebrew, which they did not. Your statement indicates narrow-mindedness. Everyone pays taxes and I hope you are not trying to say that only those who attend a public school system have a say in its methods, spending and procedures. Face it- people do not send their kids to a public school because…. ?How many of our elected officials send their kids to private school…and why? The number and answer may shock you.

    • Lakeville resident

      I am sorry….my intent was not to offend anyone. I actually agree with you!
      What I was trying to say is that Dr. Snyder needs to understand exactly what you are saying….that Lakeville parents who send their children to private schools or are homeschooling ARE NOT going to send them back to the Lakeville public schools because we now offer online learning, or a charter school within a public school, or a business academy at the high school, or a STEM program at the high school.
      Her reason for spending taxpayer money on these programs is to “woo” these 2016 students back to the district and I am saying I don’t agree with spending money on programs because THAT number (2016) is not an accurate representation of how many students MAY return to the public school system.

  • Rosie from Rosemount

    Lakeville resident, I for one am not offended by your posts.

    It is all a numbers game, and Lakeville is losing. If they get the ok to set up an online resource and if they are able to recruit out of district students to join it, the staqte mandates the distict receive the same per student allotment. Of course, on line is a lot cheaper, so this would help Lakeville pay its bills and keep its school doors open.

  • honesteducation

    Actually, Rosie, there is no hard data to illustrate that online learning is “cheaper”. Actually, most of the data available show that with the introduction of a for-profit element to the delivery of education, the cost per pupil over the long run rises exponentially in every area EXCEPT teacher and classroom education costs, which of course….decline.

    Already, since its inception and roll out in states like Ohio, K12 Inc. has already outsourced elements of its online learning program — such as test and paper grading — to for profit companies in India, amongst other places. In total, Pearson, Dell, Apple, and a slew of other technology and online learning materials producers stand to make millions from each jurisdiction signing on to this online learning program. As of today, under today’s public school model, none of these profits currently are “spent” on education. So, it doesn’t take much imagination to understand how the tab for our education starts going way up per pupil…unless is gets cut out somewhere else.

    The likely suspects are class sizes, and teacher salaries. In fact, in Wisconsin, where nearly identical programs have been rolled out, teachers now report class assignments of up to 100 students per teacher. In Ohio, it’s an average of 52. In many cases, students currently enrolled in the very same programs now being rolled out in Lakeville report having “little or no interaction” with a live teacher during the course of a semester. Under that backdrop, that’s a lot of current teacher spots that can be reduced – or outsourced – as more pupils are shifted to online learning.

    Let’s be honest – there may be room for online instruction in the future of our public schools, and a better use of technology in delivering instruction going forward is probably wise. But let’s also be honest that the plan hastily pushed forward in Lakeville with minimal public debate and/or discussion is largely a byproduct of public policy pushed forward by a series of corporations and private foundations that stand to draw millions or billions out of a previously non-profit public education system, without much in the way of data or results (other than a widely publicized internally produced “report card” that paints a picture through a narrowly biased lens), and draws much of its political breath from ALEC and other lobbying organizations that have long sought to disrupt and privatize our current public education system.

up arrow